Guide to Respirator Selection
New standards have been established concerning tolerable concentrations of contaminants in the air. Respirators are necessary to regulate employees' exposure to these contaminants. Check out PE Facts to learn more about new respirator standards and how to select one that's right for you!
On Aug. 24, 2006, OSHA released its final regulation for Assigned Protection Factors (APFs) and Maximum Use Concentrations (MUCs). On Nov. 22, 2006, these new APFs and MUCs went into effect completing the revision of the reserve sections of the standard as published in 1998. The new APFs override the existing ones along with any reference to the old APF tables found in the existing substance-specific standards (except for the 1, 3 Butadiene standard).The substance-specific standards identify several requirements for regulating employee exposure to toxic substances.
The new APFs should be used by employers to determine the exact type of respirator they need based on the level of airborne contaminants workers are exposed to. Selecting the correct respirator should be based on the exposure level of the workplace and the maximum concentration of the contaminant that a certain type of respirator can handle.
OSHA declared that the revision of the APFs makes it easier for employers to comply with standards because it removes many of the requirements found across its substance-specific standards. The new APFs enhance consolidation and standardization of these requirements and conform them to each other and to general APF and MUC requirements found in 29 CFR 1910.134(d)(3)(i)(A) and (B).
Table 1 – Assigned Protection Factors (5)
| Type of respirator (1,2) | Quarter Mask | Half Mask | Full Facepiece | Helmet/ hood | Loose-fitting facepiece |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Air-Purifying Respirator |
5 | 10 (3) | 50 | - | - |
Powered Air-Purifying Respirator (PAPR) |
- | 50 | 1,000 | 25 (4)/ 1000 | 25 |
Supplied-Air Respirator (SAR) or Airline Respirator
|
- | 10 | 50 | - | - |
Supplied-Air Respirator (SAR) or Airline Respirator
|
- | 50 | 1,000 | 25 (4)/ 1000 | 25 |
Supplied-Air Respirator (SAR) or Airline Respirator
|
- | 50 | 1,000 | - | - |
Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA)
|
- | 10 | 50 | 50 | - |
Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA)
|
- | - | 10,000 | 10,000 | - |
Notes:
1Employers may select respirators assigned for use in higher workplace concentrations of a hazardous substance for use at lower concentrations of that substance, or when required respirator use is independent of concentration.
2The assigned protection factors in Table 1 are only effective when the employer implements a continuing, effective respirator program as required by this section (29 CFR 1910.134), including training, fit testing, maintenance and use requirements.
3This APF category includes filtering facepieces, and half masks with elastomeric facepieces.
4 The employer must have evidence provided by the respirator manufacturer that testing of these respirators demonstrates performance at a level of protection of 1,000 or greater to receive an APF of 1,000. This level of performance can best be demonstrated by performing a WPF or SWPF study or equivalent testing. Absent such testing, all other PAPRs and SARs with helmets/hoods are to be treated as loose-fitting facepiece respirators and receive an APF of 25.
5 These APFs do not apply to respirators used solely for escape. For escape respirators used in association with specific substances covered by 29 CFR 1910 subpart Z, employers must refer to the appropriate substance-specific standards in that subpart. Escape respirators for other IDLH atmospheres are specified by 29 CFR 1910.134 (d)(2)(ii).
Highlights of changes made to each substance-specific standard including new APF and special selection requirements for General Industry (1910.1000):
| Chemical | Old Selection Requirements | New Selection Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Asbestos |
|
|
| Coal Tar Pitch | None noted. | None noted. |
| 4-Nitrobiphenyl and 13 Carcinogens | None noted for each from 1910.1003-1910.1016. | None noted for each from 1910.1003-1910.1016. |
| Vinyl Chloride |
|
|
| Inorganic Arsenic |
|
|
| Lead |
|
|
| Cadmium |
|
|
| Benzene |
|
|
| Coke Ovens |
|
|
| Cotton Dust | 1. Follow Table I 1910.1043(f)(3)(i) |
|
| 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane |
|
|
| Acrylonitrile |
|
|
| Ethylene Oxide |
|
|
| Formaldehyde |
|
|
| Methylenedianiline (MDA) |
|
|
| 1, 3 Butadiene |
|
No change made. Exempted from new APFs. |
| Methylene Chloride |
|
|
Commonly Asked Questions
Q. What is an Assigned Protection Factor (APF)?
A. APFs are numbers that illustrate the level of respiratory protection in a workplace that a respirator or class of respirators is expected to provide to employees when used as part of an effective respiratory protection program. The approved APF table can be found in this document (Table 1) or at 29 CFR 1910.134(d)(3)(i)(A) and (B).
Q. What is a Maximum Use Concentration (MUC)?
A. MUCs are the maximum concentrations of a contaminant in which a specific type of respirator can be used. MUC is typically determined by multiplying the respirator’s APF by the exposure limit of the contaminant. If the level of the contaminant in the workplace is expected to exceed the respirator’s MUC, the employer must select a respirator with a higher APF. Example: Acetone PEL is 1000ppm. If I use a half-mask air-purifying mask with an APF of 10, my MUC would be 10,000 ppm (PEL x APF).
Please Note: The information contained in this publication is intended for general information purposes only. This publication is not a substitute for review of the applicable government regulations and standards, and should not be construed as legal advice or opinion. Readers with specific questions should refer to the cited regulation or consult with an attorney.












